skip navigation

Latest News

  Buyer Who Failed to Complete Must Pay for Loss of Value 
  Three Days in Court the Result of Informal Arrangements 
  Mortgage Debt Not Regulated by Consumer Credit Act 1974 
  National Trust Membership Rules Out Judge in Planning Dispute 
  Court Provides Resolution to Potential Problem 
  Careless Talk Costs Land 
  Reasonable Depends on Circumstances 
  The Perils of Incautious Auction Purchase 
  Non-Compliance With Court Order Leads to Fine 
  Inaccurate Sale Particulars Lead to Repayment Order 
More...

Government to Outlaw Squatting in Residential Premises


 

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has now published its response to the recent consultation on proposals to criminalise squatting. The consultation paper, entitled ‘Options for dealing with squatting’, received over 2,000 responses. As a first step, the Government is proposing to make squatting in residential properties a criminal offence.

The offence would be committed where a person:

  • was in the building as a trespasser having entered as such;
  • knew or ought to have known that he or she was a trespasser; and
  • was living or intending to live in the building.

Section 7 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 already makes it a criminal offence for a trespasser to fail to leave residential premises when required to do so by or on behalf of a ‘displaced residential occupier’ or a ‘protected intending occupier’. While this allows those who are effectively made homeless by squatters to take action, it does not protect landlords or owners of second homes.

At present, the Government is not planning to criminalise squatting in commercial premises. Part of the reason for this is to prevent the occupation of buildings during protest activities from being caught by the new legislation. Crispin Blunt, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, said, “Stopping short of criminalising squatting in non-residential buildings represents a balanced compromise. Squatters who occupy genuinely abandoned or dilapidated non-residential buildings will not be committing the new offence, although their actions will rightly continue to be treated as a civil wrong and they can still be prosecuted for offences such as criminal damage or burglary. Neither will students who occupy academic buildings or workers who stage sit-ins to protest against an employer be caught by the offence.”

The legislation will not apply in situations where the property has previously been occupied legitimately, such as where tenants fall behind with their rent payments.

 
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
 
 

Steed & Steed Solicitors, 76-82 & 86 Coggeshall Road, Braintree, Essex, CM7 9BY | Tel: 01376 552828
6 Gainsborough Street, Sudbury, Suffolk CO10 2ET | Tel: 01787 373387

© Steed & Steed Solicitors. All rights reserved. | Legal Disclaimer | Complaints Procedure
Steed & Steed LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority - No. 508781

Registered in England and Wales under Registered No. OC 343265.
A list of members names is available for inspection at the registered office at 6 Gainsborough Street, Sudbury, Suffolk, CO10 2ET.

Where we use the word Partner or Principal it denotes member of Steed & Steed LLP.

[smaller] Change text size [larger]