skip navigation

Latest News

  C'est Bon, Le Pre-Nup 
  Lotto Win Not Part of Family Assets 
  Swiss Assets Unfrozen by Court 
  Children's Interests Need to be Assessed Individually 
  Husband Loses Appeal Over £7 Million Trust Fund Assets 
  Judge Has Discretion Not to Wait for Evidence of Psychiatrist  
  Disapproval of Son-in-Law Leads to Property Challenge 
  Inherited Wealth Not Split on Divorce 
  Court of Appeal Backs Prospective Adopters 
  Divorced Man Can Keep £1 Million in Pre-marital Assets 
More...

Husband's Covert Affair Means Wife Keeps House


 

When a wife agrees to allow the family home to be used as security for her husband’s debts, the legal situation is normally clear and the creditor can rely on her consent in order to take possession. However, a recent case, in which a wife successfully resisted the bank’s claim on the matrimonial home after she discovered that her husband had been having an affair, has shown the limitations of this principle.

The couple’s home was remortgaged in 2002 when the husband wished to consolidate private credit card debt. He had promised his wife that he would behave more responsibly in future and make the repayments due. However, he had begun an affair, which his wife discovered in 2004 and which led to their divorce in 2006.

The ex-husband was made bankrupt. His ex-wife was unable to maintain the mortgage payments and the bank sought possession of the house so that it could be sold to satisfy the mortgage. She claimed that her agreement to remortgage the property had been obtained as a result of undue influence exerted by her husband and that he had misrepresented the true circumstances.

When the ex-wife’s argument failed to impress the judge, she appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The Court addressed the question of whether she had the degree of trust and confidence in her husband (who managed the family finances) to give rise to an obligation on him to be candid and just in his treatment of her. The Court concluded that she did. She had the right to be informed of the relevant circumstances so that she could make an informed decision.

The second question was whether the husband’s affair should have been disclosed, given that he was under an obligation of candour and fairness. The Court decided that it should. The wife had agreed to the remortgage on the basis that she believed that her husband was committed to the marriage, his family and the maintenance of the family home.

Furthermore, if the wife had taken independent legal advice on the wisdom of the transaction, would the knowledge that the husband who was asking for her unqualified trust was carrying on a secret affair be relevant? The Court considered it would and accepted her appeal.

Click here for an overview of how the courts will arrive at financial settlements in divorce cases.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
 
 

Steed & Steed Solicitors, 76-82 & 86 Coggeshall Road, Braintree, Essex, CM7 9BY | Tel: 01376 552828
6 Gainsborough Street, Sudbury, Suffolk CO10 2ET | Tel: 01787 373387

© Steed & Steed Solicitors. All rights reserved. | Legal Disclaimer | Complaints Procedure
Steed & Steed LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority - No. 508781

Registered in England and Wales under Registered No. OC 343265.
A list of members names is available for inspection at the registered office at 6 Gainsborough Street, Sudbury, Suffolk, CO10 2ET.

Where we use the word Partner or Principal it denotes member of Steed & Steed LLP.

[smaller] Change text size [larger]