skip navigation

Latest News

  C'est Bon, Le Pre-Nup 
  Lotto Win Not Part of Family Assets 
  Swiss Assets Unfrozen by Court 
  Children's Interests Need to be Assessed Individually 
  Husband Loses Appeal Over £7 Million Trust Fund Assets 
  Judge Has Discretion Not to Wait for Evidence of Psychiatrist  
  Disapproval of Son-in-Law Leads to Property Challenge 
  Inherited Wealth Not Split on Divorce 
  Court of Appeal Backs Prospective Adopters 
  Divorced Man Can Keep £1 Million in Pre-marital Assets 
More...

Who Gets the Family Home?


 

Family break-up is always complicated and when there is a property involved, things can get very complex indeed.

In principle, when a couple are cohabiting (not married or in a civil partnership) the property belongs as of right to whoever is shown on the deeds as the owner.

Where there are minor children, the court will put their interests first and will normally ensure that their accommodation needs are met until they reach the age of majority. The most common circumstance in which a specific arrangement is necessary to secure the accommodation needs of minor children is when the mother and children live in a property which is owned by the father. Such arrangements may well involve a settlement into trust with the trust capital (the property) reverting to the father when the youngest child reaches 18.

In some circumstances, the courts will conclude that there is a ‘constructive trust’, which arises as a result of the arrangements made by the couple. In such cases, it is necessary for the person claiming an interest in the property which is not the same as a legal interest to demonstrate this.

The courts in such cases will consider the intentions of the parties involved. When one party claims a share in the property, the court will first ask whether there was the intention to share the beneficial interest in the property. If the answer to that question is ‘yes’, then the court will decide, on the basis of the evidence, what the nature and proportions of the couple’s shares should be. Note that it must also be shown that the claimant relied on the common intention to own the property jointly to his or her detriment.

Factors which will help substantiate a claim to a beneficial interest in a property in these circumstances will include:

  • making a contribution to the costs of purchase;
  • making a contribution to the mortgage, rates etc.;
  • making a non-financial contribution (such as working to renovate, improve or maintain the property); and
  • making an indirect financial contribution (e.g. paying other household bills so that the other partner can pay the mortgage etc.).

See our guidance on financial settlements on divorce.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
 
 

Steed & Steed Solicitors, 76-82 & 86 Coggeshall Road, Braintree, Essex, CM7 9BY | Tel: 01376 552828
6 Gainsborough Street, Sudbury, Suffolk CO10 2ET | Tel: 01787 373387

© Steed & Steed Solicitors. All rights reserved. | Legal Disclaimer | Complaints Procedure
Steed & Steed LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority - No. 508781

Registered in England and Wales under Registered No. OC 343265.
A list of members names is available for inspection at the registered office at 6 Gainsborough Street, Sudbury, Suffolk, CO10 2ET.

Where we use the word Partner or Principal it denotes member of Steed & Steed LLP.

[smaller] Change text size [larger]